A remark on Schimmerling’s question

Joint work with Ari Meir Brodsky.

Abstract. Schimmerling asked whether $\square^*_\lambda$ together with GCH entails the existence of a $\lambda^+$-Souslin tree, for a singular cardinal $\lambda$. Here, we provide an affirmative answer under the additional assumption that there exists a non-reflecting stationary subset of $E^{\lambda^+}_{\neq cf(\lambda)}$.
As a bonus, the outcome $\lambda^+$-Souslin tree is moreover free.

Downloads:

[No arXiv entry]

Citation information:

A. M. Brodsky and A. Rinot, A remark on Schimmerling’s question, Order, 36(3): 525-561, 2019.

This entry was posted in Publications, Souslin Hypothesis and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to A remark on Schimmerling’s question

  1. Ari Brodsky says:

    Submitted to Order, November 2017.
    Accepted, January 2019.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *